information

Whoever comes in this website may find a hint

Phage therapy is influenced by:

Phage therapy is influenced by:

Country :
the epidemiological situation is different from country to country in terms of circulating bacteria and bacteriophages. Example: a lytic phages from Italy may be no active on the same bacteria (genus and species) isolated from another country and vice versa.
Chronolability
Mutation rate
Phenotypical delay
Phage cocktail
My point of view

From Wikipedia


If the target host* of a phage therapy treatment is not
an animal the term "
biocontrol" (as in phage-mediated biocontrol of bacteria) is usually employed, rather than "phage therapy".

"In silico"

From:"Genomics,Proteomics and Clinical Bacteriology", N.Woodford and Alan P.Johnson

Phrase that emphasizes the fact that many molecular biologists spend increasing amounts of their time in front of a computer screen, generating hypotheses that can subsequently be tested and (hopefully) confirmed in the laboratory.

Saturday 28 June 2014

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Study of WPP-201 for the Safety and Efficacy of Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers. Phase I

Old post
Sunday, 12 July 2009

An interesting piece of news
:

From:
Journal of Wound Care, Vol. 18, Iss. 6 , 01 Jun 2009, pp 237 - 243


D.D. Rhoads, R.D. Wolcott, M.A. Kuskowski, B.M. Wolcott, L.S. Ward, A. Sulakvelidze




Objective: This phase 1 trial set out to examine the safety of a bacteriophage based preparation for difficult to treat wounds.

Method: The intention to treat sample comprised 42 patients with chronic venous leg ulcers (VLUs); 39 patients completed the trial. The ulcers were treated for 12 weeks with either a saline control or bacteriophages targeted against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Follow-up continued until
week 24.Results: No adverse events were attributed to the study product. No significant difference (p>0.05) was determined between the test and control groups for frequency of adverse events, rate of healing, or frequency of healing.

Conclusion: This study found no safety concerns with the bacteriophage treatment. Efficacy of the preparation will need to be evaluated in a phase II efficacy study.

Declaration of interest: One of the authors (AS) holds an equity interest in Intralytix. The other authors do not have any interest in commercial activities.


From Clinical Trials.gov.:


"A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Study of WPP-201 for the Safety and Efficacy of Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers"

Sponsored by: Southwest Regional Wound Care Center
ClinicalTrials.gov- Identifier: NCT00663091


Phase I : completed (April 14, 2009 )

Drug: Bacteriophage
WPP-201 is a pH neutral, polyvalent phage preparation, which contains 8 bacteriophages ("component bacteriophages" or "component phages") lytic for P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and (Table 1). The E. coli cocktail contains a concentration of approximately 1 x 10^9 PFU/ml of each of the component monophages. The phage component of WPP-201 is roughly estimated to be 0.5 ppm by weight and the remainder is phosphate-buffered saline containing < 1,000 ppm total organic carbon from the growth medium and biomass. All phages contained in the preparation have been originally isolated from the environment, and they have not been genetically manipulated in any way (i.e., the preparation is 100% natural). WPP-201 contains no preservatives and antioxidants.