information

Whoever comes in this website may find a hint

Phage therapy is influenced by:

Phage therapy is influenced by:

Country :
the epidemiological situation is different from country to country in terms of circulating bacteria and bacteriophages. Example: a lytic phages from Italy may be no active on the same bacteria (genus and species) isolated from another country and vice versa.
Chronolability
Mutation rate
Phenotypical delay
Phage cocktail
My point of view

From Wikipedia


If the target host* of a phage therapy treatment is not
an animal the term "
biocontrol" (as in phage-mediated biocontrol of bacteria) is usually employed, rather than "phage therapy".

"In silico"

From:"Genomics,Proteomics and Clinical Bacteriology", N.Woodford and Alan P.Johnson

Phrase that emphasizes the fact that many molecular biologists spend increasing amounts of their time in front of a computer screen, generating hypotheses that can subsequently be tested and (hopefully) confirmed in the laboratory.

Saturday, 28 June 2014

Exclusion of Temperate Bacteriophages from the Host Strains


From:

"Bacteria, Phages and Septicemia

Aušra Gaidelyté 1, Martti Vaara 2, Dennis H.Bamford 1
1 Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, 2 Department of Clinical Microbiology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

We observed that the majority of the bacterial isolates from septicemia patients spontaneously secreted phages active against other isolates of the same bacterial strain, but not to the strain causing the disease.
Such phages were also detected in the initial blood cultures, indicating that phages are circulating in the blood at the onset of sepsis. The fact that most of the septicemic bacterial isolates carry functional prophages suggests an active role of phages in bacterial infections. Apparently, prophages present in sepsis causing bacterial clones play a role in clonal selection during bacterial invasion.”
1-For UV induction, bacteria were grown to 200 Klett units and collected by centrifugation for 10 min at 6,000 rpm using a Sorvall SS-34 rotor at 4°C. Bacteria were suspended in the same volume of M9 broth and transferred to a glass Petri dish.
The bacterial suspension was irradiated for 42 sec at A254 followed by dark storage on ice for 1 h. Cells were collected by centrifugation for
5 min at 13,000 rpm using a Heraeus Biofuge at 22°C. Bacteria were suspended in 3 volumes of LB and the number of plaques was determined after additional two h incubation at 37°C.

2a-For MitC (mitomycin C) induction experiments, cells were grown to 200 Klett units and induced with MitC at a final concentration of 5 mg/ml. Cells were incubated for 15 min at 37°C and the growth medium was then replaced with fresh LB. Plaques were determined after additional two h incubation at 37°C.

or

2b-To confirm the absence of temperate bacteriophages,originating from the bacterial hosts a standard technique for bacteriophage induction using the DNA-damaging antimicrobial agent mitomycin C was carried out, as described by Miller.
Bacterial cultures were aliquoted in 1 ml volumes in sterile eppendorf tubes, covered with aluminium foil thus protecting the bacteria from photoreactivation of drug-induced DNA damage. Mitomycin C (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to final concentrations of 1 or 5 mg/ml . A control tube without mitomycin C was added to evaluate the presence of ‘nondrug induced’ bacteriophages. The tubes were incubated for 3 h at 37°C. Subsequently, twenty ml of chloroform was added to the control tubes to lyse the bacteria. The lysates were centrifuged in order to separate the intact bacterial cells from the supernatant. The final titre of bacteriophages in the supernatant was determined using the double agar overlay method.

3-To test if antibiotics could induce phage production, the same procedure was used as in the previous paragraph with the following
modifications. Three different antibiotic concentrations were tested depending on the antibiotic used and bacterial strain employed.
For E. coli strains, 1, 10, and 30 mg/ml final concentrations of tobramycin (tomycin, Orion Pharma) and 0.03, 0.3, and 3 mg/ml of ciprofloxacin (Bayer) were used. For S. aureus strains, 1, 10, 20 mg/ml final concentrations of tobramycin and 1, 10, 30 mg/ml of ciprofloxacin were used.

Viable counts of cell suspensions were determined to evaluate the antibacterial activity of UV, MitC or antibiotic treatment.


Methods for Phage induction
Bacterial Virulence properties altered by Phages

From:
Bacteriophage Control of Bacterial VirulencePatrick L. Wagner and Matthew K. Waldor

                             
 

“Lysis from within”, “Lysis from without”and Lysogenic bacteriophages


Bacteriophages that can only follow the lytic cycle are known as virulent bacteriophages. Lysis of the host bacterial cell can occur as a result of two possible mechanisms indicated below:

"Lysis from within”

In this case, lysis of the host cell occurs as a result of phage replication. The genetic material is the only component of the virion that enters into the host cell, which may occur through injection (bacteriophages with contractile tails) or following the enzymatic breakage of the cell wall. In both cases, the pore generated in the membrane will affect its electric potential, although this harm is easily repaired. Once inside the cell, the genetic material of the bacteriophage is replicated hundreds of times, the coat proteins are synthesized and new particles are assembled that will constitute the viral progeny (usually between several tens and a few hundreds per infected cell). Release of the progeny is the consequence of the collaborative action of the holin, a hydrophobic polypeptide that forms pores in the cell membrane, through which the lysin (a muramidase) reaches the cell wall, thus provoking the lysis of the host-cell.


"Lysis from without"

In this case, lysis of the host cell occurs in the absence of phage replication. This happens when a sufficiently high number of phages particles adhere to the cell, and lyse it through alteration of the membrane electric potential, and/or the activity of cell wall degrading enzymes.


Lysogenic bacteriophages


Some dsDNA bacteriophages, however, have the capacity to synthesize a repressor protein that silences most bacteriophage genes and results in abortion of the lytic cycle. Under these circumstances the bacteriophage DNA (the prophage) synchronizes its replication to that of the host to be inherited by its offspring.

In most cases this is brought about through integration of the bacteriophage DNA into the host genome via site-specific recombination. This alternative method of bacteriophage propagation is called the lysogenic cycle and the bacteriophages able to pursue it are known as temperate.

Is better a genetic modification of Phages or the alteration of the environmental conditions?

I have doubts about advantages regarding a modification by molecular biology or by chemical reactions of Phages for Phage Therapy. In these cases Phage Therapy would be impracticable in a hospital because it would become an artistic work. But at times these modifications may be one solution.

I prefer a genetic modification of Phages promoted by a drastic alteration of one environmental condition all through the replication cycle of Phages inside to their hosts.

Biofilms and Infectious Diseases



The Biofilm Lifecycle (video)


Looking for Chinks in the Armor of Bacterial Biofilms
by Don Monroe


Biofilm from Wikipedia


Interview with Dr. Randall Wolcott, bacterial biofilm wound specialist

Diversity of biofilms produced by quorum-sensing deficient clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
J. Andy Schaber, Adrienne Hammond, Nancy L. Carty,Simon C. Williams, Jane A. Colmer-Hamood, Ben H. Burrowes,Vijian Dhevan, John A. Griswold and Abdul N. Hamood.

A Synergistic DispersinBTM    and Bacteriophage Combo for Wound Healing
(
On Sunday, 21 June 2009 was present)


Controlling clinically relevant biofilms using bacteriophages
(write biofilm and bacteriophages)

Friday, 27 June 2014

Quorum Sensing







Quorum sensing is best characterized as a means of communication within a bacterial species, whereas competitive or cooperative signaling can occur between groups of bacteria or between bacteria and the host ( Gram-Negative bacteria,Gram-Positive bacteria and Biofilm).

Quorum sensing can be divided into at least 4 steps:
(1) production of small biochemical signal molecules by the bacterial cell; (2) release of the signal molecules, either actively or passively,into the surrounding environment; and (3) recognition of the signal molecules by specific receptors once they exceed a threshold concentration, leading to (4) changes in gene regulation.

One common consequence of quorum sensing induction of gene expression is increased synthesis of the proteins involved in signal molecule production. Increased synthesis of the signal molecule creates a positive feedback loop, which is why quorum signals are commonly called autoinducers.
 

From:
Bench-to-bedside review: Quorum sensing and the role of
cell to cell communication during invasive bacterial infection